Catoosa County leaders trim projects for March 19 vote on sales tax
by Dennis Norwood
Jan 07, 2013 | 2593 views | 4 4 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Catoosa County commissioners work to remove more than $6 million in cuts to the 2014 SPLOST budget. (Catoosa News Photo/Dennis Norwood)
Catoosa County commissioners work to remove more than $6 million in cuts to the 2014 SPLOST budget. (Catoosa News Photo/Dennis Norwood)
slideshow
After a Jan. 4 work session, Catoosa County and its two cities have reached a final figure of $59,879,499 to be presented as their 2014 SPLOST budget.

While several areas took hits, county commissioners maintained their totals for county sewer projects in the West Chickamauga, Peavine and Ringgold basins.

On March 19 voters will decide whether to continue SPLOST (special-purpose local-option sales tax) for another five years. The penny-on-a-dollar tax is expected to generate about $60 million to pay for a host of proposed projects.

In order for this budget to go on the ballot, all three government entities must come to an intergovernmental agreement no later than Jan. 15. This is required to meet the 60-day election notice.

Board of Commissioners chairman Keith Greene said, “It is important to remember that we are not generating a new tax, but merely continuing one that has been in place. We would need to double our millage rates to make up for SPLOST should we lose those funds.” Catoosa County currently has the seventh lowest millage (property tax) rate in the state, officials said.

Prior to the meeting, Catoosa County, Ringgold and Fort Oglethorpe had culled their proposed projects to $66 million, according to county manager Mike Helton said. In November they had a wish list totaling more than $100 million.

The current SPLOST, which began in 2009 after getting the go-ahead from voters, will end in 2014. By then it will have generated about $53 million.

Of the approximate $60 million from the new SPLOST, $6,089,600 will go for Fort Oglethorpe projects and $2,468,000 will go for Ringgold projects. The remainder, about $51 million, will go for county projects.

The proposed list of projects does not include $6 million for a jail/detention center expansion requested by sheriff Gary Sisk. That project was initially on the wish list but has been cut.

Helton said Sisk is looking for a commitment for a “plan B” to ensure that the expansion takes place, with other funding. This could be in the form of a bond issue, the county manager said. According to the newly-installed sheriff, “I just don't want to see us get into a situation where I am having to out-house inmates and pay those fees to do so.”

Sisk said he is currently conducting study with the Georgia Sheriff's Association as to Catoosa's needs. He said he has spoken to judge Ralph Van Pelt about the possibility of using ankle bracelets to monitor lesser offenders and thereby reduce the jail population. Current jail population is staying right at 90 percent, per Sisk.

Just as in 2009, sewers remain a primary concern for the new SPLOST. Between the Fort Oglethorpe and Ringgold area basins, officials currently have $10.6 million penciled in, compared to more than $15.7 million in 2009.

Catoosa Utility is looking at an allocation of $3.5 million for updating and replacing waterlines to meet hydrant needs and public safety guidelines.

The recreation program, which includes Boynton, county recreation, Fort Oglethorpe and Ringgold Youth Athletic Association, is currently set for $2,615,000 in funds.

In public safety, the county fire department is slated for $3.7 million in fire and rescue equipment and $2.5 million in building upgrades.

The non-funded request for the jail expansion withstanding, newly sworn-in sheriff Sisk is looking at receiving $2.1 million for 68 new patrol cars (seven new cars were previously approved at the Dec. 18 commissioners’ meeting), $255,830 for a radio cache and $658,569 for 911 center upgrades.

County roads and bridges were approved for $9,210,000 in upgrades, while county vehicles and equipment are tagged for $2,264,500 in expenditures.

Repair and upgrades to county buildings and grounds received an allotment of $810,000.

Storm water expenditures are down by over 50 percent in the 2014 SPLOST, coming in at a proposed $4.5 million. $5.9 million is set to go towards debt retirement.
Comments
(4)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
geno36
|
January 29, 2013
Say what you want Snarky, but if it doesn't get passed then our property taxes go up and only the county citizens pay for it. At least this way anybody spending money in the county pays. Also the 68 cars would not all be bought at one time they would be spread out over the next few years. And yes we do have over 68 officers in Catoosa over 3 shifts and weekends.
snarky
|
January 29, 2013
I'm willing to pay more property taxes to pay for basic,needed services.It forces the county commission to watch what they spend and be accountable.Paying for ongoing expense items with (theoretically) temporary taxes is stupid. It just ensures that when that tax is about to go away,we will be told that "vital services" will have to be drastically cut back if we don't renew it.It frees up money in the budget that should be spent on patrol cars (a basic function of government) for wasteful,idiotic stuff like bribing rich companies to come here and set up shop.

The sheriffs department has a budget.Patrol cars wear out with mathematical certainty.The sheriffs department should put patrol cars in its yearly budget at the rate that they wear out.The idea here seems to be to create a crisis by not doing any replacement until the problem is so big that only the taxpayers can handle it.

If you vote for this,you'd better be ready to pay it forever.
GAGirl1
|
January 28, 2013
Why do we need 68 new patrol cars? I don't see Catoosa County having 68 police officers? 2.1 millions is alot of money to spend on cars.

snarky
|
January 28, 2013
"Why do we need 68 new patrol cars"

Good question. The answer is because the administration that just left office made their numbers look good by not replacing patrol cars as they wore out.Now the bill for such inept management is due and the sheriff's office is painting this as a "crisis".If they can scare you or BS you enough to vote for this new tax, they'll never include new patrol cars in their budget again,even though they wear out with almost mathematical regularity.This is like planning to make your house payment with winnings from the nightly "pick 6" drawing.

I'm voting against this. I've been around a long time and I know that there is no such thing as a "temporary" tax.( The last "temporary" tax that went bye-bye was the Spanish American War phone excise tax that lasted 108 years. Look it up). The need for the "wish list" projects in this SPLOST is because your county commission is too cowardly to set the tax rate where it should be to fund basic,foreseeable needs (like patrol cars that wear out). This tax would pull about $60 million dollars out of the local economy and hand it to people that are too stupid to put basic items in their annual budget like worn out vehicles.

The good thing is that it is a consumption based tax. That means that smart people will buy their taxable items someplace else where they don't have to finance pet projects for politicians like the ones pushing this.I'll spend the minimum necessary to live here is it passes and not a dime more.

Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.