Hutcheson Medical Center trustees seek to enforce terms of 1995 lease
by Tim Carlfeldt
Apr 02, 2011 | 4153 views | 5 5 comments | 18 18 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The 40-year lease agreement between Hutcheson Medical Center and the Hospital Authority of Walker, Dade and Catoosa Counties is under scrutiny by the latter’s board of trustees.

At a special called meeting Friday night, April 1, a five-member quorum of the Authority Board considered a resolution that alleges the Fort Oglethorpe hospital has breached at least 20 provisions of the lease.

Steve Ellis, trustee representing Walker County, read aloud the resolution, which says the Authority Board has the right to terminate the lease immediately if the hospital breaches any of the provisions.

But as the board “recognizes its civic duty to ensure that there is continued access to affordable health care in the community,” it recommended that the hospital be given 90 days to earnestly demonstrate remedies for the alleged breaches.

The lease was agreed upon 16 years ago when the Authority Board, which owns the Hutcheson facilities and the dozens of acres of land on which they sit, created the non-profit companies of Hutcheson Medical Center Inc. and its parent company, Hutcheson Health Enterprises Inc.

HMC Inc. was assigned the task of day-to-day operations of the facility, formerly known as Tri-County Hospital, which was established in 1953.

The essence of the lease requires that, in exchange for the facilities, Hutcheson Medical Center must provide health care to the community regardless of a patient’s ability to pay.

The hospital continues to provide millions of dollars of indigent medical care annually.

Don Oliver, attorney for the Authority Board, said many breaches of the lease concern the financial aspects of the hospital, such as failure to comply with debt covenants and to maintain the minimum 45 days operating cash.

He said most everything in the lease provides for the 90-day “cure” period, and that approval of the resolution now is needed to expedite the matter toward completion as soon after an anticipated partnership agreement is reached.

“I am not intending in any way for this to interfere with the process with Erlanger (Health System),” he said.

Prior to Friday’s meeting Oliver issued an open letter to the trustees, giving background on the powers of the Authority Board and describing his view of the situation.

“HMC (Inc.) is nothing more than a paper entity created by this Authority to do a job,” the letter reads.

Oliver said that creation, like a terminator robot from a modern horror movie, has gone rogue. “The robot and its own servants, the administration it has hired and the attorneys it has hired, now tell the Authority what it can and cannot do; who it can hire; who it can pay; who it can do business with; how it will conduct its business.”

The Board is at a crossroads, Oliver said, and “will either facilitate and enhance this disaster which began 15 years ago, or return our hospital and the Authority to resemble the creature of the noble intentions of 60 years ago when it was created.”

Quorum quandary

Although a quorum was present and therefore could have voted to approve the resolution, four trustees were not at the meeting, including chairman Dr. Darrell Weldon and the two trustees who represent Dade County.

Authority Board vice chairman Bill Cohen, who represents Catoosa County, presided over the meeting, but as such could only vote to break a tie.

Catoosa County trustee Ken Rhudy was connected to the meeting via telephone, so he was not eligible to vote.

Rhudy said the momentum gained by the Authority Board in these recent tense months of partnership negotiations has “fallen by the wayside.”

“The bond of trust has been broken,” he said, and urged the postponement of action until a better representation of trustees could be present.

Dade County executive Ted Rumley agreed, and said that although he is not a member of the Board, he is favorable to many of the provisions in the resolution, particularly one calling for an “efficient and single board to operate the hospital.”

“But you’ve pretty much only got Walker County voting here, and in fairness I think you should have a full board,” Rumley said.

Walker County commissioner Bebe Heiskell was also in attendance. Catoosa County commission chairman Keith Green was not.

Cohen said he spoke earlier with Greene, who indicated he would appreciate the Authority Board not taking any action that would imperil the Erlanger negotiations.

In light of this, the members present voted to table the resolution and set a meeting for Wednesday, April 6 at 6 p.m.

There is a joint meeting of the four Hutcheson operating boards scheduled for Sunday, April 3.

In other Authority Board business at Friday’s meeting:

· The Board approved a resolution to ratify all professional relationships made by legal counsel Don Oliver during the process of negotiation with Erlanger Health Systems, and authorized to contract for further needs as necessary “in a reasonable and timely manner.” Former Georgia Gov. Roy Barnes and Michelle Madison were officially named as legal counsel, while Edmund Wall was reconfirmed as financial advisor.

· Representatives from Health Management Associates (HMA) of Naples, Fla. attended the meeting, and senior vice president Alan Levine gave a brief presentation regarding Hutcheson’s options for a partnership. Levine urged the Board to not “make a decision with a gun to your head.” Don Oliver indicated that after sending out requests for information on partnership options, HMA was among six companies/hospitals, including Parkridge and Memorial in Chattanooga, that expressed interest. Some returned a questionnaire that Oliver had provided while others, due to the short notice, responded verbally.

· In closed executive session, the Board reviewed its Erlanger proposal counter-offer, as “redlined” by its legal counsel. Michelle Madison was present to advise the review.

Comments
(5)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
browndog70
|
April 04, 2011
What do the taxpayers stand to lose if we do not back it and the hospital closes?

What do we stand to lose if we secure financing?

What will be return on our investment if we do back it?

Is this an investment you would make with your personal money? If not then don’t make it with our money. If the deal isn’t right then pass it up.

walkerresident1984
|
April 04, 2011
Here's something to think about... If all of this falls through because of 15 years of bad management, YOUR PROPERTY TAXES COULD DOUBLE. And I'll be the first to say that I would probably just let my house foreclose and move before paying for someone else's severance package.
hmcemployee
|
April 04, 2011
For those of you following this story on all media outlets, let me just say, for the record. I am NOT " hmcemployee" who is commenting on the Times Free Press online. Name calling is pointless and will only make others perceive us as ignorant.

With that being said, I will admit that there are others who have posted that do have valid points. But the fact remains, why wait until the last seconds of the game to pull out the "Hail Mary" play? If Bebe is being honest, she knew for years that we were heading down this road, so why not bring these issues to the public and start hospital shopping long before now?

Another thing that I can't imagine. Is everyone who has anything to do with this merger completely ignorant except for Don Oliver and Bebe? Surely, these other people are capable of making intelligent and informed decisions. It just smells very fishy that 2 people are the only ones who claim to know what is best and are trying to stop this partnership by whatever means necessary.

More than anything, I would like to know the true agenda of Don Oliver and Bebe. I do hope that Bebe is not planning for a re-election. All Walker County residents/HMC employees and their families will certainly have a few things to say when it comes election time.
nannylinda
|
April 03, 2011
It is time to move on, instead of looking at what you could have been looking at other options 6 months ago. The other 3 boards have voited to go with erlanger, now this primary board needs to do the same. If not as a walker county resident , I need to begin looking at what is the hold up and how it could benefit them?. Cause the other reasons do not benefit me or anyone else in the 3 counties. If the hospital closed where will the poor go? who pockets are being lined?( as rumor). Why people keep saying we are not holding up the partnership with erlanger when their actions speak louder. get with the program Ms. Bebe and Mr.Oliver the time is now. do the right thing and vote for the erlanger partnership. cause the florida hospital doesn't have any good pt reviews posted on their website like they do at Hutcheson. we also need to look at why Mr. Oliver is working for the hospital board and walker county;covering the same problems and getting paid by both for the same thing. isn't this conflict of interest between him, the county and the hospital? the good old boy system needs to end. Every one who is for the people of the 3 counties need to step up to the plate and vote for them not their poltics.
jsummey
|
April 03, 2011
How will Hutcheson maintain the terms of the agreement with a for profit organization such as HMA? The terms state that the hospital should care for the indigent population and a for profit organization will not continue this practice.

Furthermore, I would rather not have an attorney with a criminal background such as Don Oliver be the voice for my tax dollars. How can he advise the authority board on legalities when he was incarcerated less than 15 years ago??
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.