Walker county judge sues commissioner over salary
by Christi McEntyre
Oct 31, 2012 | 3942 views | 5 5 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Walker County state court judge Bruce Roberts has filed a case against sole commissioner Bebe Heiskell, asking to be compensated for a discrepancy in salaries between his own and that of his predecessor.

Roberts was appointed to the Walker County state court by Gov. Nathan Deal on Oct. 3, 2011, after the early retirement of judge Donald Peppers on Aug. 31.

Roberts ran an unsuccessful campaign against Billy Mullinax this summer to retain the state court seat. He was defeated in the July 31 primary election. Mullinax, who has no opposition in the Nov. 6, general election, will take over the judgeship in January.

Roberts’ suit, filed Oct. 25, alleges that while Peppers had received an annual salary of $172,102.80 prior to his retirement, Heiskell “arbitrarily” assigned a $100,000 salary to Roberts upon his appointment.

Roberts contends that his appointment before the expiration of Peppers’ term granted him incumbent status. He contends that Heiskell’s salary judgment is contrary to the state constitution, which states that “an incumbent’s salary, allowance, or supplement shall not be decreased during the incumbent’s term of office.”

The suit further states, “If relief is not granted to Petitioner, he will suffer pecuniary loss for which he cannot be compensated in damages, to wit, immediate loss of salary and related benefits. The actions of Respondents are unreasonable, capricious and arbitrary and is an illegal attempt to exercise a discretion which is clearly forbidden by Georgia Law.”

As of Wednesday afternoon, Heiskell had not responded to a call for comments regarding the suit. More details, including the commissioner's response, will be added as they become available.

Comments
(5)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
lafayettemoon
|
November 01, 2012
If it's against the law, it's against the law ...Bebe will lose, and say that the state has to be right, much like the $65,000 in-kind for violations up at Rock Creek. If she wins next Tuesday, that is.

More taxpayers money gone from a self-induced strapped budget.
can'tstandit
|
November 01, 2012
Actually Judge Roberts and Ms. Heiskell discussed this from the start and the cut in pay was a direct result of her and Jeff Mullis not getting their person appointed. In every way possible, Judge Roberts attempted to get along with her, but to no avail. Mr. Mullinax will come into office, get paid much more than Judge Roberts and the selling of DUI dismissals and reductions will begin immediately. Judge Roberts was voted out of office, but he's not part of the corrupt system that IS Walker County. Follow the money.
thompsonart
|
October 31, 2012
Fair is fair. Unfair "ain't"!!
SnakeCreekGap
|
October 31, 2012
This is the second 'tantrum' from former Judge Roberts. The first was the dismissal of a slew of cases and now this? Hardly the behavior that would be expected of a judge. Mr. Roberts should have challenged his salary after his appointment if he had a problem with it. Now we are seeing 'sour grapes' as a result of his loss of the election at the expense of the taxpayers. This is hardly the behavior that should be expected from a judge, however the second paragraph in the report really tells the story...He as appointed by Gov. Nathan Deal, so we should have really seen this coming.
Becky214
|
October 31, 2012
SnakeCreekGap.....you hit it right on the head! He has waited an entire year to bring this up? It is "sour grapes". I would venture to say that he agreed to his salary when appointed. I think that Governor Nathan Deal would regret ever appointing him now that his true colors have come to surface. What an inmature individual!
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.